A Real-World Analysis of the Population with Hepatitis C Virus Infection Affected by Type 2 Diabetes in Italy: Patients’ Characteristics, Comorbidity Profiles and Treatment Patterns
Background and Objectives: HCV infection represents a main risk factor for type 2 diabetes (T2D). This real-world analysis investigated the HCV-positive (HCV+) population with a T2D co-diagnosis in Italy. Methods: From 2017 to 2021, HCV+ patients were identified from administrative databases and stratified into T2D-HCV+ and HCV+-only cohorts in the presence/absence of a T2D diagnosis. Both cohorts were further divided by treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). The subgroups were compared for demographic variables, comorbidity profiles, most frequent hospitalizations, and drug prescriptions before inclusion. A sensitivity analysis was performed on patients included after 2019, the year of widespread use of pangenotypic DAAs. Results: Considering HCV+ patients aged ≥55 years, T2D-HCV+ patients (N = 1277) were significantly (p < 0.001) older than HCV+-only (N = 6576) ones and burdened by a worse comorbidity profile (average Charlson index: 1.4 vs. 0.3, p < 0.05). Moreover, regardless of T2D presence, DAA-treated patients were older (p < 0.001) and had a worse Charlson index than the untreated ones. T2D-HCV+ patients showed tendentially higher hospitalization rates and co-medication prescriptions compared to the HCV+-only patients. After 2019, a trend towards reduced co-medication use in DAA-treated patients was noticed, especially antibiotics and cardiovascular drugs. Conclusions: The co-presence of T2D in HCV+ patients resulted in a worse clinical status, as confirmed by the more frequent requirement of hospitalizations and complex polypharmacy regimens
Drug Utilization of Rifaximin-α in Patients with Hepatic Encephalopathy: Evidence from Real Clinical Practice in Italy
Background and Objectives: This analysis described rifaximin utilization in Italian patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Although rifaximin is effective in preventing HE relapses, therapeutic management and prescriptive attitudes might be improved. Materials and Methods: Between Oct-2020 and Sep-2021, approximately 12.7 million citizens, patients hospitalized for HE, were identified through the ICD-9-CM code 572.2. Among those discharged alive, utilization of rifaximin 550 mg vs. rifaximin 200 mg for two months post-admission was compared. Results: Of 634 patients hospitalized for HE, 447 (70.5%) were discharged alive. In the two following months, 276 (61.7%) received rifaximin, of whom 117 (26.2%) received rifaximin 550 mg (two daily tablets) and 159 (35.6%) received rifaximin 200 mg (six daily tablets); among 171 patients without rifaximin, 56 (32.7%) received lactulose/lactitol. One year after rifaximin initiation, patients on rifaximin 550 mg (vs. 200 mg) were more frequently persistent (i.e., did not interrupt therapy) (78.6% vs. 46.9%, p < 0.001), showed a lower switching proportion (21.4% vs. 40.7%, p < 0.050), and had a mean monthly dose closer to the recommendations of 36,000 mg/month (~33,000 mg/month vs. 11,629 mg/month, respectively). Conclusions: This analysis suggests suboptimal rifaximin utilization for HE management. Although rifaximin 550 mg is the only formulation with specific indication and reimbursability to prevent HE relapses in Italy, rifaximin 200 mg is more largely used. The need to improve rifaximin prescribing choices is supported by higher persistence, lower switching rates, and average doses aligned to recommendations in patients treated with rifaximin 550 mg.